Archive of articles classified as' "Opinionated"

Back home

The last WebMaster

25/05/2009

If you have been around on the web for ten years or more you will remember (or maybe even filled the role) of the mythical “WebMaster”. The WebMaster would design and program your site. He (or she… but lets be honest girls. Mostly he) would publish your articles and fix your site when broken. He’d do some voodoo behind the scene and something very close to what you wanted would happen. He’d tell you what would work on the net and what wouldn’t. He would not be questioned. He was The WebMaster.

Ok, so usually the WebMaster was someone’s cousin who knew HTML, where to cut’n paste JavaScript snippets from and generally no marvel to behold, but it was a title not to be taken lightly and godsdamnit we held it in high regard.

But I’m not here to wax poetic about the lost title of The WebMaster. I’m here to talk about how the position, once highly esteemed, as a “Jack of all trades” 1 in, well, WebMastery; fits into the calculation nowadays.

The last WebMaster
Read the rest of this article »

  1. It’s not widely known, but the saying as whole goes: “A jack of all trades and a master of none is often better than a master of one.”
6 Comments

Prattle of the Pettiest

9/04/2009

Java Action Script Faceoff
Original photo by Flickr user alexerde. Bastardized thoroughly by yours truly.
These two posts by Keith Peters do a marvelous job at summarising an age-old frustration that most ActionScript developers and I’m certain developers in many other languages, have either faced or actively promulgated.
Namely the attitude that while my language is certainly a robust and decent Object-Oriented Programming language, yours is obviously the stuff of programmer playgrounds and can hardly be considered programming at all.
I’ve broadly steered clear of participating in these pissing contests, but I’m sick to death of them and wish the collective programming community would grow the hell up and quit Balkanizing 1 since we all seem to have flourishing and genuinely resourceful communities in each our camps.

The first post.
The second post that explains the first post to the hard of thinking, but is still worth a read to us really smart folks.

  1. Apologies to Aral Balkan who of course represents anything but what this term has come to mean.
No Comments

The MacHeist Unlock Scheme

4/04/2009

MacHeistIf you’re a Mac user chances are good you already know about MacHeist. In summary MacHeist is a bundle of Mac apps sold at a very ridiculously attractive price. Usually if only one or two apps in the bundle appeal to you you already save money by buying the bundle.

This is all well and good, but the really interesting thing about MacHeist is that it’s a stroke of marketing genius. Since the first iteration through to the third and current one the MacHeist guys have used an amazing array of guerrilla marketing and the traditional “It slices! It dices! It solves world hunger!” tactics to create a buzz around the product, including but not limited to:

  • Detective style “missions” to unlock free stuff, usually by snooping around Mac-centric sites for clues but extending to even Rot15 encrypted ads in Mac-blogs’ RSS feeds.
  • Fake hacker-defacing of several well-known sites in the Mac community. (With the paticipation and consent of the owners of those sites). This one really caused a lot of controversy.
  • Enlisting people to do Twitter promotion (spam) for freebies, referral programs etc…
  • And; charity donations which is of course very cool.

There’s been loads of controversy over MacHeist, concerning both their marketing tactics (see the defacing thing above) and their buisness model. Exemplified here by highly regarded Mac pundit John Gruber.

All this has been said and debated, so I won’t go into those criticisms. And before I bring up my own peeve with MacHeist let me first state that I do find the bundle to be a very lucrative deal for the end-user (me) and I have in fact shilled out the 39 bucks for it.

Alright; MacHeist, as I mentioned, donates 25% of their earnings to a charity you may pick yourself from a selection, and theres no getting around that this is a great thing. One of the ways they promote this is to “lock” some of the apps until a certain amount has been “raised for charity”. When the first goal is reached the first app is unlocked (for all customers) and the next goal is stated, and so on.
Macheist Donations
The main reason I bought the bundle was to get The Hit List and Espresso. $39 for those two alone is a very sweet deal. What I didn’t notice before I actually swiped my credit card was that these two apps won’t be available before a certain, unknown amount of money has been, as they say, “raised for charity”.

The fact that I didn’t read the agreement properly is my fault.
The way they go about this however makes me feel a bit queasy. You see, what I mistakenly read, and grudgingly accepted, was that the locked apps would be made available when 400.000 had been “raised”, but it turns out that some other app I don’t care about will be unlocked at 400.000, and the two apps I do care about will be unlocked when an amount of money they won’t tell you what is has been raised. So even when I was willing to gamble, now I’m suddenly playing blindfolded.

Now, I’m not actually worried that I’ve wasted my money, and I’ll tell you why in a second, but I think this adds itself to a number of questionable marketing practices. Here are my grudges:

  • The goal is stated to be to “raise money for charity”. What we’re doing however is purchasing your product which earns you money of which you will donate a portion to charity.
    Only stating that “we won’t give you these apps before we’ve made enough money” doesn’t sound as nice as “C’mon folks! Let’s help them starving kids. If we can get enough for a new orphanage we’ll give you these apps as a bonus!”. It’s disingenuous and icky. I really think that you’re donating to charity is great, and something you can pride yourselves on, but this is pushing it.
  • I don’t mind your refferral scheme. I do mind your Twitter spam scheme, but I’ll let that one lie for now. But the fact that what you’re doing with this unlocking schtick is to hold the apps ransom so that your customers will go pester their friends or spam forums to get people to purchase the bundle is obvious and ugly.
    I didn’t like it back in the nineties when the less intellectually endowed among my friends joined the pyramid schemes and tried to recruit me every other day, and I don’t appreciate it now.
  • And even if I didn’t feel that this “it’s for charity” angle is nauseating, I strongly dislike the idea of not telling me what the goal is for the final apps in the bundle.
    To paraphrase Terry Pratchett; “It’s like playing a game of cards in a dark room when no one will tell you the rules, and everyone is smiling all the time!”.

Now, that was a good long rant. Now let me tell you why I’m not actually feeling very concerned that I might have wasted my money.

  • If MacHeist doesn’t unlock the final two apps they’ll have a PR shitstorm to deal with. MacHeist thrives on the rep of being a wildly successful, highly engaging experience, rather than just a software bundle.
    I don’t know any other software bundles that has a forum of dedicated members (complete with fanboys and trolls) and can get their customers to jump through hoops for bits and bobs.

    If they hold out on the last two apps they’ll appear to A: Having failed business-wise. And B: Being mean to their customers.

  • Secondly; I’m fairly certain that The PotionFactory and MacRabbit (makers of The Hit List and Espresso respectively) won’t be too happy to have participated in this whole mess and then not get paid, so of course they will get paid; and if they get paid I’m pretty sure MacHeist doesn’t really feel like wasting some tens of thousands of software licenses at the expense of angry customers.

    And even if they would do something inane like that, I’m pretty sure that the afore-mentioned developers actually want to see their apps distributed, because happy users recommend products and sell more licenses.

  • Thirdly; There really is no other reason for the hare-brained move of keeping the goals secret than to make sure you can adjust them according to what you feel certain the outcome can be.

In conclusion; MacHeist has some wacky marketing solutions. Sometimes actually quite cool, sometimes pretty yucky and on occasion only describable as doubleyou-tea-eff. Still. There’s no denying that the bundle is a fantastic bargain.

No Comments

Freud on homosexuality

19/01/2009

Freud, the father of the psychoanalysis, received a letter from a woman who was deeply worried about her son, describing what she perceived as his abnormalities and seeking advice. This is Freuds reply.

Dear Mrs….

I gather from your letter that your son is a homosexual. I am most impressed by the fact that you do not mention this term yourself in your information about him. May I question you, why you avoid it? Homosexuality is assuredly no advantage, but it is nothing to be ashamed of, no vice, no degradation, it cannot be classified as an illness; we consider it to be a variation of the sexual function produced by a certain arrest of sexual development. Many highly respectable individuals of ancient and modern times have been homosexuals, several of the greatest men among them (Plato, Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, etc.). It is a great injustice to persecute homosexuality as a crime, and cruelty too. If you do not believe me, read the books of Havelock Ellis.

By asking me if I can help, you mean, I suppose, if I can abolish homosexuality and make normal heterosexuality take its place. The answer is, in a general way, we cannot promise to achieve it. In a certain number of cases we succeed in developing the blighted germs of heterosexual tendencies which are present in every homosexual, in the majority of cases it is no more possible. It is a question of the quality and the age of the individual. The result of treatment cannot be predicted.

What analysis can do for your son runs in a different line. If he is unhappy, neurotic, torn by conflicts, inhibited in his social life, analysis may bring him harmony, peace of mind, full efficiency whether he remains a homosexual or gets changed. . . .

Sincerely yours with kind wishes,
Freud

How come we still have people trying to “cure” homosexuality with therapy? And how come married couples in California are being divorced against their will?

No Comments

Girl with flower

19/01/2009

You reap as you sow.

girl_with_flower_in_post

Click for large version.
(I’d give credit, but I have no Idea who the artist is…)

No Comments